I really appreciate the good achievement done by the DT members. I also prefer to pick up a single solution. Based on SRCOMP presentation, only CSID can meet all requirements and already there is open source code supporting CSID. Hence, I think it is ready for WG to proceed with the adoption of CSID.
Thanks, Tetsuya > On Jul 27, 2021, at 12:11 AM, Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Given the design team accomplished the work on providing requirements and > analysis to compress an SRv6 SID list, I would recommend we pick 1 solution > similar to what was done in NVO3 (when we discussed GENEVE, GUE, GPE, etc) > given this has to be implemented in HW.. > > I hope we can conclude on this asap and move forward on this topic > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
