I really appreciate the hard work accomplished by the DT members.

As a user and implementer, I would also agree that it's preferred to pick a 
single solution so we can focus the effort to improve and standardize the 
selected solution.

Thanks,

--
Kentaro Ebisawa | Mailing List: <[email protected]> | Work: 
<[email protected]>

On 2021/07/27 16:11, Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) wrote:

Given the design team accomplished the work on providing requirements and 
analysis to compress an SRv6 SID list, I would recommend we pick 1 solution 
similar to what was done in NVO3 (when we discussed GENEVE, GUE, GPE, etc) 
given this has to be implemented in HW..

I hope we can conclude on this asap and move forward on this topic


_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to