Thanks for DT's hard work completing SRv6 header compression requirements and
solutions comparion.
I agree that it's better for industry if we all accept only 1 standard solution
for SRv6. The different solutions compared by DT might originate from different
main scenarios, such as C-SID mainly for standard SRv6, UIDSR mainly for both
SR-MPLS and compressed SRv6. For standard SRv6 scenario, when we pick 1
solution the whole industry will be benificial with implementation, testing and
interoperation, etc.
Regards,
Aihua
原始邮件
发件人：Henderickx,Wim(Nokia-BE/Antwerp)
收件人：[email protected];
日 期 ：2021年07月27日 15:11
主 题 ：[spring] SRv6 compression
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
Given the design team accomplished the work on providing requirements and
analysis to compress an SRv6 SID list, I would recommend we pick 1 solution
similar to what was done in NVO3 (when we discussed GENEVE, GUE, GPE, etc)
given this has to be implemented in HW.
I hope we can conclude on this asap and move forward on this topic
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
