+1 Kind Regards
Gyan On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 4:54 AM Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) < [email protected]> wrote: > I agree with Wim’s statement that the precedent in NVO3 **could** apply > here too: pick one solution as Standard’s track RFC, and once it is done, > the others might be documented as Informational RFCs if they have > implementations. > > > > That would help the industry to move forward. > > > > Thanks. > > Jorge > > > > > > *From: *spring <[email protected]> on behalf of Henderickx, Wim > (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <[email protected]> > *Date: *Tuesday, July 27, 2021 at 9:11 AM > *To: *[email protected] <[email protected]> > *Subject: *[spring] SRv6 compression > > Given the design team accomplished the work on providing requirements and > analysis to compress an SRv6 SID list, I would recommend we pick 1 > solution similar to what was done in NVO3 (when we discussed GENEVE, GUE, > GPE, etc) given this has to be implemented in HW.. > > > > I hope we can conclude on this asap and move forward on this topic > > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring > -- <http://www.verizon.com/> *Gyan Mishra* *Network Solutions A**rchitect * *Email [email protected] <[email protected]>* *M 301 502-1347*
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
