Does this not boil down to the globally effective legal footprint for Habeas?
That is if you are a spammer and originate from outside this footprint you won't have any problems abusing the mark. My 0.02 English pence worth. Alan > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Michael Satterwhite > Sent: 20 January 2004 11:25 > To: David A. Carter; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Turning off Habeas? > > > On Monday 19 January 2004 23:06, David A. Carter wrote: > > > > > Before turning off Habeas (or even worse, giving it a > positive score), > > please take time to read this thread, particularly Bob > Proulx's response. > > > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general/38623 > > I'd read that thread when it was first posted. It doesn't > change the fact that > the vast majority of habeas marked email that I'm seeing *IS* > spam. For all > the legal threats, I'm getting more habeas marked email from > these people on > a daily basis. Not less, more. > > I wish them well, and hope that they eventually do get to sue > these people. My > goal, however, is to keep spam out of my inbox. It is not > logical to give a > negative score to email that has a high probability of being spam. > > ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
