To tell the truth, this is the first spam that I actually recieved in my Inbox in 3 days... between Bayes and BigEvil, I average only 1 out of the 150+ spams I've been receiving per day that SA doesn't catch.
However, now I'm spoiled and I never want to see another spam message (!), so I grumble when one makes it through, especially one that isn't so badly munged by the spammers' efforts to defeat the filters that it's actually readable ;^) Take that, you spamming bastards! And may all spammers rot in jail; those guys in VA may have been simply ignorant and greedy, but the precedent needs to be set so when the clever ones _are_ found, they can be dispatched with equal fury. If we let the dumb ones off easily, then we have no chance against the smart ones with $$ to defend themselves... I bow to the SA developers... Rubin On Sun, 2003-12-14 at 14:44, Robert Nicholson wrote: > Did it also pass the RBL checks and DCC checksum check? > > ie. are you quering any external clearing houses with a signature of > the message > to see if it has been reported as spam already? I only turned this on > yesterday > and it makes a dramatic difference in the accuracy. -- Rubin Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> RB Technologies
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
