At 12:47 PM 12/14/2003, Rubin Bennett wrote:
The spammers are getting smarter about Bayes... this one sneaked through
SA 2.6, a well trained Bayes database, and the BigEvil rules with a
score of 1.0 out of 5.  What to do?

That's funny.. it hit BAYES_99 on mine...


Admittedly I had to do a kinda half-assed reconstruction of the message, since you copy-pasted it, instead of attaching an mbox. I only wound up getting a HTML part of a multipart/alternative message, so I changed the content type to text/html.

I got these hits on my copy of SA 2.61 (note: MIME_HTML_ONLY is a result of my edit. MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET may be a side effect of your copy-paste removing some parts of the message headers).


Content analysis details: (6.8 points, 5.0 required)


 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 5.4 BAYES_99               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
                            [score: 1.0000]
 0.3 MIME_HTML_ONLY         BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
 0.1 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
 0.3 HTML_FONT_BIG          BODY: HTML has a big font
 0.6 MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET   RAW: Message text in HTML without charset
 0.1 BIZ_TLD                URI: Contains a URL in the BIZ top-level domain
 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS          RBL: SORBS: sender is listed in SORBS
                            [213.23.140.55 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to