The Backhair rules nailed it (10 points). I (duh) didn't even look carefully at the HTML so I missed the really ugly tags in there.
Thanks! Rubin On Sun, 2003-12-14 at 12:47, Rubin Bennett wrote: > The spammers are getting smarter about Bayes... this one sneaked through > SA 2.6, a well trained Bayes database, and the BigEvil rules with a > score of 1.0 out of 5. What to do? I'm sure that the sleazebags that > come up with these will send many of them now that they've figured out > it works. It's starting to look like we're going to have to teach SA > how to read full sentences and/ or paragraphs, and making sure that it > can pick out when someone dumps a random collection of hammy words into > a message... > > And, has anyone given any thought to working the SA engine up in C or > something faster than Perl? I've seen many issues with system resources > and SA, and the answer keeps coming back as one of two responses: > 1. Get more system resources > 2. Throttle SA to a certain number of simultaneous threads > > I'd be very happy to see a 3rd possibility: make SA less hoggy of the > resources, so that one could run more instances with less CPU etc.. > Kind of like what happened with MRTG and the rateup routine (was Perl, > then some kind soul re-wrote it in C and exponentially improved it's > performance). > Just a thought... > > Rubin -- Rubin Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> RB Technologies
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
