Robert Menschel wrote: > You beat me to it ... I was going to suggest the same thing. I've been > feeding all of my list traffic through sa-learn for the past month, and > if anything it has improved my Bayes performance.
I think the idea of bypassing list mail is efficiency - you know it's not spam (hopefully it's already been filtered), so why filter it. And unless your general mail is of content similar to topic specific list mail - though granted, at least some will likely be - there's no need to learn it. Though multi-user systems with opt-in, and user configuration, may indicate otherwise, I suppose. Bryan > Bob Menschel > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN's Audience Survey. > Help shape OSDN's sites and tell us what you think. Take this > five minute survey and you could win a $250 Gift Certificate. > http://www.wrgsurveys.com/2003/osdntech03.php?site=8 -- Nothing in the world has more potential for beauty than woman. Nothing has more potential to destroy it, than the world. - (Anonymous) http://www.wecs.com/content.htm This signature file is generated by Pick-a-Tag ! Written by Jeroen van Vaarsel http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=pick-a-tag ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN's Audience Survey. Help shape OSDN's sites and tell us what you think. Take this five minute survey and you could win a $250 Gift Certificate. http://www.wrgsurveys.com/2003/osdntech03.php?site=8 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
