> True, rbls are what eats up the time, but my production (2.55) box > doesn't appear to have this issue. Both boxes are running essentially > the same configuration, especially WRT rbl lists. Plus, from the spamd > logs on the 2.60 box, it looks like messages are being processed in just > a few seconds anyway. > > I was hoping to bump up the timeout option, unfortunately, it looks like > 2.55's spamc doesn't have a -t option. > > Perhaps that's the problem? Any gotchas from running 2.55's spamc > connecting to 2.60 spamd?
I don't know what the official policy is, but I've gotten away with it for awhile now. > > Thanks! > > --Rich > > _________________________________________________________ > > Rich Puhek > ETN Systems Inc. > 2125 1st Ave East > Hibbing MN 55746 > > tel: 218.262.1130 > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________ > -- Jack Gostl [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
