On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 02:59:42PM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote: > already using on 2.55 I'm curious to know if the new values were chosen > empirically or whether some kind of stats were involved to check the lowest > scores of spam and the highest scores of ham etc...
They were chosen by looking at the STATISTICS* files. > I can see that the reason for doing this is to have the report header off > in report_safe 1 mode, since it is a duplication, but is there a way for it > to be on by default in report_safe 0 ? Set "use_terse_report 1". It should probably be renamed "report_header" or someting (except that would probably confuse folks due to the old "report_header"...) > Another quick question, I see that it looks like the number of stars > displayed on X-Spam-Level is now restricted to 50 stars.... ? :/ Thats Yes, it's documented. > unfortunate as part of my procmail script relied on seeing 80 stars or more > to be able to detect blacklisted email (only)... and it will be quite > difficult to rearrange that along with the user preferences frontend I > have...is that 50 star limit staying in ? Since there's no way to wrap that header (think when GTUBE hits), we needed to limit the length of the line. Any choice would potentially cut the line short, so we chose 50 which means that it's unlikely the full header will go over 80 chars (remember, you can rename X-Spam-Level to anything you want, so we're not guaranteed on header length.) -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "Is there a space between the wall and paint?" - Bob Lazarus
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
