At Mon Aug 25 00:36:02 2003, Simon Byrnand wrote: > > I do wonder though whether the very long lines are a good idea. Normal > email bodies are normally wrapped to a certain maximum line length, is it > necessary for headers to be wrapped as well ? Since 2.60 the X-Spam-Status
SMTP specifies a maximum line length of 1000 characters -- 998 characters followed by CR and LF. > header is no longer wrapped, its just one big long line and I wonder if > that could cause problems with other clients as well as Squirrelmail ? Is the break at 1000 characters, I wonder? There's no RFC-imposed limit to the total length of a header that's split over multiple lines, but maybe Squirrelmail has a built-in limit that's being exceeded. Martin -- Martin Radford | "Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | men just upload their important stuff -o) Registered Linux user #9257 | on ftp and let the rest of the world /\\ - see http://counter.li.org | mirror it ;)" - Linus Torvalds _\_V ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
