I re-suggest (v 1.1) something like the original comments followed by:
*
#These are suggested starting values for users too lazy or otherwise unable to run the GA optimizer to find the optimal values.*
#score RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 1.8 #score RCVD_IN_DUL 0.8 #score RCVD_IN_DUL_FH 0.8 #score RCVD_IN_RBL 1.8 #score RCVD_IN_RSS 1.8
(note: I'm not a saDev.. so take my comments as those of a community member, not a viewpoint of the saDev team)
However, those values would be guesses on the part of the sadev team. Why would Theo's guesses be any better than yours or mine. All this serves to do is provide an illustrative example, but really if you need this kind of example, you shouldn't be tweaking SA at this low a level yet. There's textual documentation right there.. those existing comments should be sufficient, and if it's not, they shouldn't be playing with this stuff (at least not yet).
Really adding in rules is something that inherently involves score tweaking. I'd be greatly afraid that these would create the impression that no tweaking is needed.
It's nice to make things easy.. except when it comes to making it easy for someone to shoot themselves in the foot by leading them to do something they don't understand the implications of.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
