Simon Byrnand said: > The FTC (in the US) is already doing just that. They can't go after spam in > general, but they *can* and do go after spam that hawks fraudulent products > etc.... However I suspect that they're woefully understaffed for the job at > hand :)
And the same will apply with any proposal where the police are required to go after the spammers -- which is why a small-claims-court-based proposal would be better. ie. offload the task to the spam victims. Otherwise the police's "bandwidth" will quickly be swamped... --j. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
