RW> Does this mean that SpamAssassin is blind to the contents of base-64 RW> encoded HTML?
Apparently so; but it does correctly identify the email as being base-64 encoded. I would simply recommend that you raise the score in the local.cf file for the SA test BASE64_ENC_TEXT to near or above your minimum spam threshhold. I have yet to see a *valid* email that is Base-64 encoded. RW> If so, does this mean that spammers can use this to RW> bypass many of SpamAssassin's tests? I never would have asked this RW> before because I didn't know that HTML could be sent this way. Yes, that's why they use it. It's just one more spammer trick. -Abigail ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
