"SpamAssassin 2.52-cvs". Here I'm absolutely stymied. There was never a 2.52-cvs in my tree. And "2003-03-20" doesn't look like "the latest" to me.
*Anybody else know what Dan is talking about?*
You are being excessively harsh, Tony.
Ouch ... sorry Dan I didn't mean to be harsh, I simply put down what I'm thinking. e-mail isn't a very good medium for doing that - you can't look the reader(s) in the eyes.
SAproxy 1.1 did indeed use 2.52-cvs rather than 2.52. I don't know why you're attacking someone about the version number. Non-tagged releases CVS check-outs append "-cvs" to the version number.
It wasn't my intention to attack anyone. I'll obviously have to gen up on SAProxy.
Tony -- Tony Earnshaw
Working to get a life
http://j-walk.com/blog/docs/conference.htm http://www.billy.demon.nl Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
