Tony Earnshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "SpamAssassin 2.52-cvs". Here I'm absolutely stymied. There was never a > 2.52-cvs in my tree. And "2003-03-20" doesn't look like "the latest" to me. > > *Anybody else know what Dan is talking about?*
You are being excessively harsh, Tony. SAproxy 1.1 did indeed use 2.52-cvs rather than 2.52. I don't know why you're attacking someone about the version number. Non-tagged releases CVS check-outs append "-cvs" to the version number. SAproxy 1.2 uses 2.55. I'd suggest than Dan upgrade to SAproxy 1.2, of course. In terms of writing new rules, the best place to begin is Matt Kettler's rule writing guide. Is there a permanent URL for that? Maybe we can add a link to the FAQ or something? Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan anti-spam (SpamAssassin), Linux, and open http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/ source consulting (looking for new work) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
