Tony Earnshaw wrote:

 > one thing I noticed is that for messages that are enc-64 , it seems
 > that other tests are NOT run on the decoded message. I'd suggest
 > decodeding and then running all the regular tests OR if there is no
 > plain or html message and its only enc-64, chances are 99% that its
 > spam and should get a high score.

All of the later 2.5x SA and certainly my 2.60-CVS parse and decode base64-encoded stuff and then run normal tests on it. Decoding base64 isn't difficult but adopting use of it became a spammer ploy to fool more naive filters.

So what version of SA are you using? What model and what year is your Ford?
----------
I downloaded the "latest" from SAproxy....
the header that comes thru says:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.52-cvs (1.174.2.7-2003-03-20-exp)

D



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay
Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here:
http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to