Matthew Davis said the following on 01/12/02 22:18:
It seems worse than NANAS to me. While with NANAS you have to do a little extra work to strip the commentary, at least you almost always get full headers there.* Michael Bell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:Agreed. I think it's worthless too. Just wanted to bring up the topic, so we could all be prepared for newbies asking the question.
Now we have a thread to point to
Here's an example of their substandard corpus. Note that while looking for an example, i ran into another false positive out of 5
(a "we're relocating our address to...")
Note how much has been stripped
So if I understand this correctly, the only real point of this spamarchive is to preform body spam checks? Most of the headers have been stripped or munged by humans. But the headers is really were we can catch most of the spammers, so i see it as a good effort, but useless.
Matt.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
