Michael Bell said: > A fair statement as to what it is good for,yes. It could be used for > bayesian body stuff - dunno how that's stacked up in your tests > (which I notice do include most headers) - but it's pretty limited > otherwise.
well, bayesish stuff does *much* better when it's allowed at the headers, in most tests I've heard of. It does quite well without them, but headers in spam contain some really great spam-signs, so no implementation would overlook them unless they *had* to. ;) --j. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
