has 5 test corpuses. (f,etp.spamarchive.org/archives) I will note that they are poorly organized, with the headers hand edited, and useful things like the RECEIVED headers removed. Hence all DNS stuff wasn't worth running. Plus I'm dubious about what they've done to the formattting,etc.
That being said - I ran SA 2.43 in -L mode, against this and Justin's corpus. For Justin's SPAM, SA was successful about 83% of the time. For SpamArchive001, SpamArchive002 (which is all I've finished so far), the success rate is only about 60%. Good topic for discussion? __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
