> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ronald Wiplinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 21 November 2002 13:50
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Is to identify yourself by return email necessary in
> the future?
> 
> I just come accross the article at 
> http://slate.msn.com/?id=2074042 which describes that each 
> new sender must first himself identify by answering a return message. 
> I love that idea!
> 
> Is such a module available within SpamAssassin?
> I would like the picture methode, rather, than the just reply methode.
> 
Won't work... what about receipts from online transactions?  Mailing lists?

The last thing I would want as a mailing list admin is to be bombarded with
these
things - I'd probably just blacklist the senders permanently.

This isn't really anything I'd expect SA to have anything to do with - SA
just rates
emails for 'spamminess' it doesn't do anything about them... that's for your
MTA to
sort out.

Tony



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to