Ross Vandegrift ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) had this to say on 11/18/02 at 20:59: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 04:59:28PM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote: > > There are many mail senders out there that send ligitimate mail that > > often gets flagged as spam, and finding ways to avoid being tripped up > > by these types of filters is not a pointless discussion. > > Is there a reason that companies who want to send legit mail that looks > spammy can't just PGP/GPG sign it? This way, a user can be sure of the > source.
Most people wouldn't know what to make of a strange attachment that came with their email. Plus, some sites block ALL attachments, including PGP signatures. -- PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF Member, LEAF Project <http://leaf.sourceforge.net> AIM: MikeLeone Public Key - <http://www.mike-leone.com/~turgon/turgon-public-key.asc> Registered Linux user# 201348
msg10381/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
