On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 08:36:25PM -0600, Jeremy Turner wrote: > According to http://spamassassin.org/tests.html, PGP_SIGNATURE and > PGP_SIGNATURE_2 are -.5 and -.7 which would give them extra breathing room > in case they turn up positive otherwise.
Whoa. GPG/PGP signitures used to carry a -50 or so! What's the line of thinking here? I've never once recieved a signed piece of spam that was signed. OTOH, I've recieved lots of real signed mail. Has this rule been exploited? Maybe the idea of signing legit commercial mail wasn't so hot. -- Ross Vandegrift [EMAIL PROTECTED] A Pope has a Water Cannon. It is a Water Cannon. He fires Holy-Water from it. It is a Holy-Water Cannon. He Blesses it. It is a Holy Holy-Water Cannon. He Blesses the Hell out of it. It is a Wholly Holy Holy-Water Cannon. He has it pierced. It is a Holey Wholly Holy Holy-Water Cannon. He makes it official. It is a Cannon Holey Wholly Holy Holy-Water Cannon. Batman and Robin arrive. He shoots them. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
