-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Brian Kendig wrote: > Another interesting thing -- spamc is being called with the argument > '-s 256000', which ought to just refuse to process any message longer > than 256K, right? But I just tried sending through an email with a > 2.1MB attachment, and spamd timed out after five minutes again...
BTW: Why are we checking attachments at all. Should it be enough to test against what is displayed by most MUAs on reading the message, i.e. for MIME multipart message, normally the first part which should be text/plain or text/html (or both (alternative)). Then we could check against the existence of attachments but does checking their actual content make any sense at all? It's not common for spam to have attachments anyways. What do think you can find in their? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: pgpenvelope 2.10.2 - http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net/ iD8DBQE9vFjrY6Nk2Nv6ZRcRAnUwAJ4r/yqxoqdCiNdDqbaILe8QZzZeCgCeJz3b fs52bUaeNMKiLtzA8hHMibo= =IhOm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
