On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 03:46:34PM -0500, Brian Kendig wrote: > I tried setting 'skip_rbl_checks 1' in local.cf and killing/restarting > spamd, but that had no effect. I have Razor installed, but the SA docs > say that razor_timeout defaults to 10 seconds, so that shouldn't hold > things up, should it? Are you saying that I should set the scores of > the Razor tests to zero and that'll prevent SA from using them?
It depends on the version of Razor. 2.20 breaks SA's timeout, so...
I would turn off all network tests (set the score to 0), and make sure
none of them are running by checking with running with "spamd -D".
It's likely the CPU isn't the problem, so I want to try elliminating
stuff that's not running local to your machine.
> probably aren't unique to me. How do I tell SA that Razor's installed
> and it can start using it?
You can't, it'll detect the perl modules being available and use them
automatically. Again, -D will tell you if it is doing Razor checks.
> Another interesting thing -- spamc is being called with the argument
> '-s 256000', which ought to just refuse to process any message longer
> than 256K, right? But I just tried sending through an email with a
> 2.1MB attachment, and spamd timed out after five minutes again...
Hmmmm.
> Any ideas on my other question, too? How do I get spamd to use the
> rules I set up for it in local.cf?
It should automatically use those. Running spamd with -D should tell
you what it's up to.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Come on, honey. You work yourself stupid for this family. If anyone
deserves to be wrapped up in seaweed and buried in mud, it's you.
-- Homer Simpson
Home Sweet Homediddly-Dum-Doodily
msg09536/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
