Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-24 07:16:54 +0200]: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 04:20:16PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote: > > 0.5, and I'm not high volume. If you do leave any DNSBLs on, make sure > > your spamd server has FAST access to a nameserver. I'd even go as far as > > to recommend a caching nameserver running on the same server as the machine > > Won't a caching DNS like djbdns on the box help, with that large > number of users?
Don't all nameservers cache? I know that BIND caches lookups. (Only responding so that people won't think that only djbdns caches. Both nameservers do.) Bob
msg09301/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
