On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 04:20:16PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote: > 2) zero the scores for several, or all, of the DNSBLs. I personally took > the approach of zeroing the scores of DNSBL's for ones which score under > 0.5, and I'm not high volume. If you do leave any DNSBLs on, make sure > your spamd server has FAST access to a nameserver. I'd even go as far as > to recommend a caching nameserver running on the same server as the machine > running spamd if it doesn't already have a normal DNS server on it.
Won't a caching DNS like djbdns on the box help, with that large number of users? Another question is: What causes the load? I/O or CPU usage? -- Ralf Hildebrandt (Im Auftrag des Referat V a) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charite Campus Mitte Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155 Referat V a - Kommunikationsnetze - Fax. +49 (0)30-450 570-916 "I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4729346;7592162;s?http://www.sun.com/javavote _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
