On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 12:44:49AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: > > Won't a caching DNS like djbdns on the box help, with that large > > number of users? > > Don't all nameservers cache? I know that BIND caches lookups. (Only > responding so that people won't think that only djbdns caches. Both > nameservers do.)
They do, but djbdns is about 3-10 times faster at caching than BIND. Just an idea. -- Ralf Hildebrandt (Im Auftrag des Referat V a) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charite Campus Mitte Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155 Referat V a - Kommunikationsnetze - Fax. +49 (0)30-450 570-916 "Lotus Notes for Dummies" is surely a single page pull out with "don't" printed on it. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4729346;7592162;s?http://www.sun.com/javavote _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
