Jeremy Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I realized that I hadn't sent this reply back to the group... [snip] I'm wondering if a spammer included a bogus X-Spam-Status: header in the spam. Most how-to examples have people checking to scan emails only if that header does not exist. Couldn't a spammer include this and escape spamassassin unscathed? Or could the X-Spam-Status: header be rewritten (if it already exists) with the content of the latest spamassassin scan? I will admit that I haven't looked through any archives or anything to see if this has been discussed before. ----------- I do not know how this could cause a problem if you are simply using spamassassin to scan all incoming emails. After a spamassassin check, the X-Spam-Status: header, whether one or several, can be checked via maildrop or procmail. I simply trigger on any status that comes up with spam occurring. Then into the trash/spam box with it. Sunil ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
