Jeremy Turner said: > I'm wondering if a spammer included a bogus X-Spam-Status: header in the > spam. Most how-to examples have people checking to scan emails only if > that header does not exist. Couldn't a spammer include this and escape > spamassassin unscathed? Or could the X-Spam-Status: header be rewritten > (if it already exists) with the content of the latest spamassassin scan?
The latter. It'd be too easy otherwise! --j. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
