[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> Have you asked your provider why they don't just boot the spammers?

No, for several reasons:

1. Free colocation is extremely hard to find.  We would be crazy to
   rock the boat.

2. It's not my job.  Why should I be forced to harass the ISP because we
   are unlucky enough have IP addresses near some spammers?  The SPEWS
   policy just adds to the harm created by spammers.  Spammers know how
   to avoid RBLs and often do, they just switch ISPs and change IP
   addresses from time to time.

3. It's not my call.  There is more than one non-profit on the network.
   Unless I can find a better colocation deal for everyone, it would be
   unethical for me to complain because it seems likely to decrease the
   probability that the for-profit will continue donating colocation
   services.  We've had to relocate equipment before when a company
   changed their mind and it was not easy.  There's an expression:
   "Don't look a gift horse in the mouth".

Finally, it's not just these two sites, of course.  A lot of innocent
non-spammers have been targeted by SPEWS.

Dan


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to