Daniel Quinlan said: > 2. It's not my job. Why should I be forced to harass the ISP because we > are unlucky enough have IP addresses near some spammers? The SPEWS > policy just adds to the harm created by spammers. Spammers know how > to avoid RBLs and often do, they just switch ISPs and change IP > addresses from time to time.
So you admit that your provider is harboring spammers and ignoring complaints about them. As a customer you're in a better position to discuss the problem with your provider than anybody else. > > 3. It's not my call. There is more than one non-profit on the network. > Unless I can find a better colocation deal for everyone, it would be > unethical for me to complain because it seems likely to decrease the > probability that the for-profit will continue donating colocation > services. We've had to relocate equipment before when a company > changed their mind and it was not easy. There's an expression: > "Don't look a gift horse in the mouth". Then you shouldn't complain about your SPEWS listing. > > Finally, it's not just these two sites, of course. A lot of innocent > non-spammers have been targeted by SPEWS. SPEWS is a list of spam-friendly ISPs. A description that fits your ISP by your own admission. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
