Daniel Quinlan wrote: >> Being listed in SPEWS will trigger these rules: >> >> RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM - generic rule >> X_OSIRU_SPAM_SRC - SPEWS specific?
Michael Moncur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > According to osirusoft, this is not SPEWS specific: | 127.0.0.4 Confirmed Spam Source | A site has been identified as a constant source of spam, and is | manually added. Submissions for this type of spam require multiple | nominations from multiple sites. Test Blockers also find | themselves in this catagory. > So, it should only happen if you're listed in SPEWS plus something else, in > theory. They have a Spews.relays.osirusoft.com zone that only lists SPEWS, > we could use that in a meta rule. I suspect adding a !__RCVD_IN_SPEWS to a meta rule would actually result in worse results for either rule. What you really want is a way to query Osirusoft leaving SPEWS out of the calculation. Perhaps we should generally move away from the multiple site rules (ones that take inputs from more than one site) and focus on single site rules. Then, the GA can do its thing better and we can do our own determination of worth and write our own meta rules rather than relying on Osirusoft internal "meta-like" rules. Dan ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
