Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes, going back up in the thread to my posting yesterday: > > http://relays.osirusoft.com/cgi-bin/rbcheck.cgi > > This lists which blocklists that OSI uses are listing an IP, and in the > case of spews, gives links over to spews where you can check the evidence > file for the particular listing.
Yes, but with SPEWS, you are listed if you share the same ISP as a spammer. I help maintain a /27 network (32 consecutive IP addresses) used by several non-profit .org sites (no spammers!), but we are listed on SPEWS because there are spammers on other parts of the class C network (not at the same physical location). The ISP bill (which is considerable) is 100% donated by a for-profit company (also not a spammer), so what exactly are we supposed to do? In other words, much of the inaccuracy of SPEWS is due to their policy, not administrative delay or errors. As an intermediate step, I might be okay with using SPEWS to see how their individual accuracy rates with the GA, but only as a separate rule, not co-mingled with other blacklists. I'd rather just delete them and I don't see why we should support them. Dan ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
