On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Bart Schaefer wrote: > Hmm, here's a thought. Each SA rule could (optionally) be assigned a > "category" (porn, UCE, MLM, fraud, etc.). SA could then tally up a > "category score" as well as a basic spam score, and the subject tag could > be selected using the category that scores highest.
God no, please. It was hard enough getting our customers to put the single filter rule for ******SPAM****** in their e-mail clients. Having to go back and add umpteen million more defeats the purpose of the subject tag. I don't think OE and the other GUI clients are case sensitive by default, so switching to ******spam****** should be safe. Anything further is going to affect thousands of non-technical users who just want the crap out of their mailbox and thought they were all done with the hard part. Although, if SpamAssassin as an entity had to make the change to avoid legal issues, I'd probably just add a global procmail rule to rewrite it back within my organization and save our support crew a ton of headaches. My 2 cents, -- Kip Turk, RHCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systems Administrator/Killer of Spam/Writer of Code/Penguin Proponent West Central Net - tel: 915.234.5678 / 800.695.9016 fax: 915.656.0071 -.-. --- -.. . / -- --- -. -.- . -.-- --..-- / .... .- -.-. -.- . .-. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Oh, it's good to be a geek. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
