> Well, if you're autoreporting, I would agree. But we're agreeing that > you shouldn't autoreport. What we're disagreeing about is whether you > should report the spam after you verify that the message is in fact spam.
Ah... Somewhere along the way I took a turn into the weeds. Thanks for winching me out of the ditch and back onto the road. > >> If SpamAssassin correctly categorized it for you then it will also > >> correctly categorize it for me and everyone else. No need to put that > >> into Razor in that case. If it is dead already then you don't need to > >> try to kill it deader. > > This isn't exactly true either (my installation is not equal to your > installation), but the part I'm disagreeing with is the part that says "If > SA catches the spam, there's no need to report it to Razor." I don't care > whether SA thinks a message was spam or not, if I look at the message, > and it's spam, I report it to Razor. If SA is nice enough to mark it as > spam so I can easily go through and check them, that's a plus for me, but > it in no way negates the benefit of then reporting the message to Razor. Okay. The razor db is designed as a database of spam. If you have a spam then razor would want it in its collection. Certainly it is fine and okay to report any spam message there. Good discussion! Thanks Bob
msg07086/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
