>>> score X_NOT_PRESENT -1.920 >> >> This one is on my hitlist as well. Didn't work out very well.
Craig R Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But it actually turns out to be great at clawing back false > positives. I think we should leave it in with the low score. Hrmm, it seems responsible for a lot of missed spam, though. Maybe we could write a rule that uses it and other criteria to detect that sort of local email. They rarely seem to have any MIME and have relatively few Received: headers. I also have some good headers ready to check into HEAD for "clawing back" functionality. Here they are: header X_MAILING_LIST exists:X-Mailing-List header RESENT_TO exists:Resent-To header USER_AGENT exists:User-Agent header X_LOOP exists:X-Loop score RESENT_TO -1.000 score USER_AGENT -1.000 score X_LOOP -1.000 score X_MAILING_LIST -1.000 Dan _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
