On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 01:20:49PM -0700, Craig R Hughes wrote: | Daniel Quinlan wrote: | | DQ> Michael Moncur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | DQ> | DQ> > And a few slightly questionable scores: | DQ> > | DQ> > - This was 0.87 before. Less and less useful? | DQ> > score FROM_AND_TO_SAME -2.071 | DQ> | DQ> I think this one should go. It's a common way to send email to a | DQ> large list of people without subjecting them all to the address list.
Isn't that what "Undisclosed Recipients:" is meant for?
| DQ> > - Lots of missing dates in non-spam?
| DQ> > score DATE_MISSING -2.140
| DQ>
| DQ> This just doesn't happen often enough, I think. In 7846 messages (23%
| DQ> spam), I have zero occurances.
|
| I think it's a screwy thing happening in my mail archive. The other
| occurrences of this in nonspam are in Matt Cline's and rodbegbie's
| archives. Could you guys take a look and see what messages are
| triggering this for you?
I've noticed at least some MTAs that add a date header if it is
missing, and also add an X-Date-Warning: header explaining that.
-D
--
An anxious heart weighs a man down,
but a kind word cheers him up.
Proverbs 12:25
http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/
msg06414/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
