I'm confused about this
Received: from maynard.mail.mindspring.net ([207.69.200.243])
by mail.vasoftware.com with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian))
id 16q0IX-0007Fw-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 15:24:13 -0800
Received: from sdn-ar-001casfrmp092.dialsprint.net ([158.252.208.94] helo=apex)
by maynard.mail.mindspring.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
id 16q0IS-0008CZ-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 18:24:09 -0500
SPAM: Hit! (1.5 points) Received from dialup, see http://www.mail-abuse.org/dul/
SPAM: [RBL check: found 94.208.252.158.dialups.mail-abuse.org]
SPAM: Hit! (2.0 points) Received via a relay in relays.osirusoft.com
SPAM: [RBL check: found 94.208.252.158.relays.osirusoft.com.]
SPAM:
So, we didn't receive the mail from a dialup IP, it was sent from a dialup
IP to the mindspring mail relay, which is the way it's supposed to be, and
the mindspring mail relay sent the mail to us.
Is spamassassin actually giving a combined 3.5 score to any mail that
originated from a dialup IP, even if it was properly relayed through an
ISP's mail server?
Marc
PS: The whole mail still gets a very high score of 8.2 without those two
hits. Should messages incorrectly flagged as spam be sent to the sightings
list too?
--
Microsoft is to operating systems & security ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP key
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
