On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 06:22:03PM -0800, Matthew Cline wrote: > On Sunday 03 March 2002 05:58 pm, Craig R Hughes wrote: > > I just pushed out the new scores (and a bugfix or two) as 2.11 > > > > The new scores are done by constraining the GA more, using Michael Moncur's > > submitted scores as a starting point, and then hand-tweaking the output > > where basically any -ve scores that came out but which only existed in the > > corpus as spam (or in the nonspam corpus as highly dubious nonspam) were > > reset to something small and +ve > > Interesting negative scores: > > score INCREASE_SALES -1.273 > score CASHCASHCASH -0.839 > score OPPORTUNITY -0.651 > score DEAR_SOMEBODY -0.492 > score SUBJ_REMOVE -0.471 > score ONCE_IN_LIFETIME -0.405 > score DEAR_FRIEND -0.242 > score MAILTO_LINK -0.226 > score PROFITS -0.162 > score FOR_JUST_SOME_AMT -0.148 > score TO_MALFORMED -0.050 > > So did these things appear in more non-spam than spam? For most of these > rules, I've never seen them appear anywhere but in spam. >
And even if they are, lets try to make rules catching nonspam and score them negative rather than having rules designed to catch spam that do the opposite and score them negative. -- Duncan Findlay _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
