On Sunday 03 March 2002 05:58 pm, Craig R Hughes wrote: > I just pushed out the new scores (and a bugfix or two) as 2.11 > > The new scores are done by constraining the GA more, using Michael Moncur's > submitted scores as a starting point, and then hand-tweaking the output > where basically any -ve scores that came out but which only existed in the > corpus as spam (or in the nonspam corpus as highly dubious nonspam) were > reset to something small and +ve
Interesting negative scores: score INCREASE_SALES -1.273 score CASHCASHCASH -0.839 score OPPORTUNITY -0.651 score DEAR_SOMEBODY -0.492 score SUBJ_REMOVE -0.471 score ONCE_IN_LIFETIME -0.405 score DEAR_FRIEND -0.242 score MAILTO_LINK -0.226 score PROFITS -0.162 score FOR_JUST_SOME_AMT -0.148 score TO_MALFORMED -0.050 So did these things appear in more non-spam than spam? For most of these rules, I've never seen them appear anywhere but in spam. -- Visit http://dmoz.org, the world's | Give a man a match, and he'll be warm largest human edited web directory. | for a minute, but set him on fire, and | he'll be warm for the rest of his life. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 132152059 | _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
