After all the bashing about scores <-5, I'd suggest scoring these around -2 or -3: they're extremely easy to forge if you're a spammer.
C Matthew Cline wrote: > Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 00:40:41 -0800 > From: Matthew Cline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] Filter idea: non-spammish mail agents > > Here's something that I'm currently trying out: make a list of mail user > agents which are unlikely to be used for spam, and lower the hits for mail > that matches. Here's what I currently have: > > header NON_SPAM_MAILER_1 X-Mailer =~ > >/(?:CWMail|Edsamail|eGroups|KMail|MailCity|MIME-tools|Mozilla|Eudora|Yahoo|Evolution|Internet > > Mail Service|SquirrelMail|Apple Mail|Excite|exmh|Lotus > Notes|Opera|Z-Mail|fastmail|Perl|Emacs)/ > describe NON_SPAM_MAILER_1 User agent not one often used for spamming > > header NON_SPAM_MAILER_2 User-Agent =~ > /(?:Mutt|Mozilla|Emacs|eGroups|Microsoft-Entourage|SavvySubmit)/ > describe NON_SPAM_MAILER_1 User agent not one often used for spamming > > score NON_SPAM_MAILER_1 -10.0 > score NON_SPAM_MAILER_2 -10.0 > > _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
