On 01 March 2002, Nigel Metheringham said:
> I can see the idea you are working on, but -10 seems a huge weighting
> for this rule (ie twice the default spam threshold).
Agreed. I'm as dubious of high negative scores as I am of high
positives. Gut instinct tells me -1 .. -2 for "non-spam" MUAs, because
as soon as the smart spammers notice that rule, guess what they'll add
to their headers...
Greg
--
Greg Ward - software developer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MEMS Exchange http://www.mems-exchange.org
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
