On Friday 01 March 2002 01:42 am, Nigel Metheringham wrote: > On Fri, 2002-03-01 at 08:40, Matthew Cline wrote:
> > Here's something that I'm currently trying out: make a list of mail user > > agents which are unlikely to be used for spam, and lower the hits for > > mail that matches. Here's what I currently have: > > score NON_SPAM_MAILER_1 -10.0 > > score NON_SPAM_MAILER_2 -10.0 > I can see the idea you are working on, but -10 seems a huge weighting > for this rule (ie twice the default spam threshold). Yeah, I'm just playing with it. -- http://dmoz.org | Give a man a match, and he'll be warm for a | minute, but light him on fire, and he'll be The world's largest human edited | warm for the rest of his life. edited web directory directory | ICQ: 132152059 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
