On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote: > On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 01:06:06PM +0000, Matt Sergeant wrote: > > > On 20 Feb 2002, Nigel Metheringham wrote: > > > > > > > The biggest problem with razor at present is the lack of vetting of > > > > input, and some form of input validation is essential if razor is to be > > > > more than a curiosity - for example at present it appears all BUGTRAQ > > > > postings are being entered into the razor database and for while last > > > > week this happened to the razor list itself. > > > > > > Are they still not doing that? Wow, I'm surprised. A system like that > > > really needs good vetting. > > > > would they not consider something like moderated nntp ? It's fine system > > for vetting distruting arbitary data across large collections of hosts. > > Any sort of mailing list moderation system would work. Setup something > like ezmlm with moderation, then make new "spams" go as emails to the > list, and let moderated messages become new entries in the database. None > of this is rocket science of course ;-)
Because those are both too slow. Part of the point is to get stuff into the database -fast- so that an in-process spam run can get thwarted. They're looking for a system where you trust -submitters- (eh, roughly.) -- Charlie Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] Frontier Internet, Inc. http://www.frontier.net/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
