On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Charlie Watts wrote:

> On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Charlie Watts wrote:
> >
> > > And I'm actually playing with Razor again. It isn't nearly as broken as it
> > > was for a while. But I've got some spare CPU cycles to throw at Razor
> > > right now. Razor probably wouldn't be worth re-implementing in a C
> > > re-write, but the Rhyolite.com DCC system might be.
> >
> > Razor's trivial to re-do in C. Simply use DNS - allow people to lookup
> > md5sum.razor.org (or whatever the domain is to be) and map the Razor db to
> > a DNS db. Use DJBDNS, it's trivial. Really incredibly trivial.
> >
> > Damn, there I go giving the game away again ;-)
>
> Heh, been following the discussion on the razor list?

No, I never bothered subscribing since we don't intend to use Razor (I
don't think the architecture is up to the bandwidth we would hit it with).

> There have been some
> arguments about whether DNS is or is not useful for Razor.
>
> Vipul just posted some comments about what the "future of Razor" is, might
> be worth reading.

I'll go take a look. Thanks.

-- 
Matt.
<:->get a SMart net</:->


________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to