On 19 Feb 2002, Craig Hughes wrote: > On Tue, 2002-02-19 at 14:57, Charlie Watts wrote: > > And I'm actually playing with Razor again. It isn't nearly as broken as it > > was for a while. But I've got some spare CPU cycles to throw at Razor > > right now. Razor probably wouldn't be worth re-implementing in a C > > re-write, but the Rhyolite.com DCC system might be. > > Let us know Charlie -- sounds like you're like me in somewhat > mistrusting Razor since it used to be pretty flakey. If it is now > working better, that's be good to know. Also, I'd be very interested in > some objective assessment of the merits of DCC -- I've been meaning to > take another look at it -- last time I checked it was in a fairly > rudimentary state of usefulness. By the way, I just got a bug report > that razor calculation is broken in SA somehow -- it's apparently > calculating the wrong signature for emails or something -- check > bugzilla #42 for more info.
I'm seeing Razor as useful again. It still slows things down, but everything seems to be smoothed out and it's working well for me now. I haven't had any Razor-related problems in a few weeks. The new "stop after reaching spam threshold" setting in spamd makes the network tests much easier on my machines (bloody near half of my mail gets tagged as spam, so this reduces lots of load on them). -- Charlie Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] Frontier Internet, Inc. http://www.frontier.net/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
