On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 01:06:06PM +0000, Matt Sergeant wrote: > > On 20 Feb 2002, Nigel Metheringham wrote: > > > > > The biggest problem with razor at present is the lack of vetting of > > > input, and some form of input validation is essential if razor is to be > > > more than a curiosity - for example at present it appears all BUGTRAQ > > > postings are being entered into the razor database and for while last > > > week this happened to the razor list itself. > > > > Are they still not doing that? Wow, I'm surprised. A system like that > > really needs good vetting. > > would they not consider something like moderated nntp ? It's fine system > for vetting distruting arbitary data across large collections of hosts.
Any sort of mailing list moderation system would work. Setup something like ezmlm with moderation, then make new "spams" go as emails to the list, and let moderated messages become new entries in the database. None of this is rocket science of course ;-) -- Matt. <:->get a SMart net</:-> ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
