On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 05:46:31PM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote: > It can't hurt to add the rule. Then people using RBL checks in exim can > turn off the rbl checks in SA and automatically get the benefit of the > rule w/out having to compose their own rule. I guess the only possible > problem is where people don't turn off SA RBL checking and so messages > get a double score because they hit the Exim header rule, and then also > fail the RBL tests.
I'm not debating the simple test. I'm wondering whether this would be a good idea: > > > > Arguably this is too much of a guesswork... it could do the same parsing on > > > the header as it does in its own internal RBL tests, perhaps? I think Exim > > > includes the string the RBL servers return in the header. -- Duncan Findlay _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
